How often have we, as professional pest managers, heard that you must think like a pest to manage them? With this saying in mind, why would a mouse or rat be attracted to a food plant? Perhaps it is odors emanating from open vents and doors? Maybe it is warm air produced by the cooking process or harborage zones, such as low-growing shrubs along a building’s perimeter?
Conditions vary on each side of a food plant. For example, dock doors and Dumpster areas are more conducive to rodent entry and development than a concrete wall with limited entry points. Despite such differences, many food plants have rodent stations spaced evenly around all walls. What does this truly accomplish? Furthermore, how much time do boilerplate rodent management programs waste that could be utilized for pro-active rodent inspections?
Unfortunately, the “why” of rodent equipment spacing is oftentimes dictated by auditing standards. Many third-party auditors require stations and equipment placed in different ways, but what they ask for is not particularly science-driven. It is more of a “let’s have a station every ‘X’ number of feet so if a rodent randomly gets to the building it may encounter a control device.” This strategy implies rodent activity is more or less random, and not predictable.
Rethinking Placement.
In actuality, pest professionals should place rodent management devices along food plant perimeters based on rodent activity data collected through visual inspections, device maintenance services and trend analysis reports. This helps reduce rodenticide use, places stations where they are more effective and frees up time for the most critical part of pest prevention — INSPECTION!
Exterior areas of food plants typically have some level of rodent pressure. Analysis of the habitat profile on the food plant’s property and adjacent properties is key. For instance, areas with field crops or meadows are more prone to rodent populations than paved sides or parking lots. Docks and Dumpsters are particularly vulnerable to rodent activity. Detailed analysis and assessments of food plant properties provides a road map for selection, use and placement of rodent control devices.
In addition, ongoing, pro-active analysis of exterior rodent pressure through data collection is the cornerstone for deciding numbers of exterior devices needed and where they should be placed. Data collection software platforms can expedite the data collection and analysis process through trend reports that provide valuable insights into where and when rodents are encountering the exterior areas of the food plant. However, in order for the rodent data inputs to be accurate and concise, one must remember the old saying, “junk in equals junk out.”
Seek the Masses.
Pest professionals should keep in mind rodent populations, like most other pest populations, tend to be clumped and not evenly distributed around exterior building perimeters. Doesn’t it make better sense to place exterior rodent control devices where these rodent populations “clump” for maximum effectiveness?
Exterior, tamper-resistant bait stations with rodenticide baits have been the gold standard of rodent management at food plants for decades. However, rodenticides are not necessarily the only materials that can be used inside tamper-resistant bait stations. Non-toxic monitoring blocks (Detex, NoTox) can also be used at food manufacturing facilities. Non-toxic monitoring blocks reduce non-target organism poisonings, rodenticide cost and waste. Just think of the tons of rodenticide waste that could be put to better use than at the bottom of a landfill!
When non-toxic monitoring blocks are used at food plants, bait stations that exhibit rodent activity or captures must be serviced weekly until the rodent activity ceases. Some companies simply place rodenticides in lieu of the non-toxic monitoring block until the rodent activity ceases, while others install snap traps to catch the foraging rodent. Our company utilizes snap traps that immediately stop the rodent activity and contain it within the station. They also provide the exact species of rodent that is feeding within the station (e.g., white-footed mouse vs. house mouse). Some companies abandon monitoring blocks altogether and use snap traps 100% of the time.
If a snap trapping strategy is employed, it is critically important that pest professionals servicing the stations to be able to accurately identify and interpret rodent signs such as fecal pellets, sebum stains and gnaw marks, and to install proper snap trap types (e.g., rats vs. mice) inside each station.
Snap traps used inside exterior bait stations are likely to be investigated by insects, especially ants. Insect baits can be used inside and around bait stations, according to label directions, to help reduce insect activity. The Nara Lure is a relatively new novel device that also can be used as a snap trap attractant (plastic matrix with an allergen-free, aromatic attractant) which could reduce insect contamination.
Bait station types play a big role as well. The lock-and-load style stations or patio stone-based anchoring system that permits easy relocation are best suited for risk-based rodent management. These bait station types can be shifted to areas with higher rodent activity with minimal lost time for the pest professional and can be cleaned much better than unmovable bait stations. Keep in mind that each time bait stations are relocated, the equipment map for the food plant must be updated to reflect changes.
Multi-catch traps also can be used outside. Powder-coated traps can withstand most weather conditions and when used properly can reduce interior mouse captures. A client recently shared their seasonal rodent capture rates fell a whopping 90 percent because of exterior multiple-catch traps!
think and act proactively. In summary, exterior rodent management programs need to make sense and match the exterior ecology of each food plant. Cookie cutter rodent management layouts waste time and resources because the majority of exterior bait stations or equipment will never kill or capture rodents. It’s much better to divert the labor used checking unused equipment into pro-active inspections, data analysis and interpretation, and then place rodent control equipment where they truly manage rodents.
Remember, think like a pest to manage them!
About the author: Brian Beidle is technical services manager at Collins Pest Management, Evansville, Ind., and can be contacted at bbeidle@gie.net.
Explore the August 2015 Issue
Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read.
Latest from Pest Control Technology
- Apex Bait Technologies Receives USDA Grant
- Orkin Canada Releases 2024 ‘Rattiest Cities’ List
- Ecolab Joins NPMA's Key Partners Program
- Tailor Made Pest Control Acquires Swat Team Pest Control
- FMC and Envu Complete Sale of FMC’s Global Specialty Solutions
- UF Researchers Use AI, Lasers for Precision Spraying to Combat Mosquitoes
- Colony Pest Raising Money to Fight Cancer with NOSHEMBER
- NPMA Announces Leader Launch Class of 2025