“Rodent control is like (a pair of) pants. One size does not fit all — regardless of how they’re marked,” said Mark “Shep” Sheperdigian, BCE, vice president of technical services at Rose Pest Solutions, Troy, Mich. “They’re not going to fit everyone. They’re either going to be too big or too small. Truth is, they’ll need to be tailored to fit you.” The same is true for rodent control: one program won’t fit the needs of every facility.
“To make matters worse, we tend to think of rodent control as ‘more is better,’ or ‘bigger is better,’” said Sheperdigian. “Bigger is not always better. Better is better. A tailored program is the only way to approach rodent control, because no two situations are exactly the same.”
Each facility has idiosyncrasies that make it unique. Some buildings are sieves, others have an ample food source, while others have landscaping that provides ample harborage for rodents, as well as many other critters. As you develop and review a rodent control program, start with the basics.
We often fall into comfortable routines, personally and professionally. Haven’t we all thought: I saw the same problem a few years ago at another facility. The program included X and Y and it worked. The same should work here. Or, possibly the worst routine of all, we’ve always done it this way. Those are characteristics of the old approach to developing a rodent control program.
Rodent populations rise and fall. “Optimizing rodent control is the process of making adjustments so the amount of resources you’re providing to a facility is appropriate for the degree of risk,” said Sheperdigian.
Tape Measure?
“We base a lot of our rodent control on what the tape measure says — how far apart bait stations or devices should be placed,” said Sheperdigian. We’re allowing a tape measure to make decisions for us, he said. “With that thinking, rodent activity has very little to do with the program.”
“The home range of an average mouse, in an average situation, is roughly 25 feet,” explained Sheperdigian. Placing bait stations every 25 feet, or better yet every 12 feet, to intercept that mouse seems reasonable. More is better, right? “The truth is you’re going to end up with too many bait stations in some areas, and not enough in others. You’re not considering where that mouse is more or less likely to live.”
Manufacturers provide device placement guidelines and they should be used as such — guidelines. There isn’t an exact distance devices should be placed. Place them where they’ll be most effective to address the rodent problem. Sometimes that’s 15 feet apart; other times it’s 50 feet apart. You’re smarter than your tape measure and you have more experience, too.
Surrounding the Building?
“If you’re only placing devices around the outside perimeter of a building, you’re going to be missing a lot of rodent activity,” said Sheperdigian. “Once mice are inside they could be just about anywhere!” Perimeter placement isn’t enough.
Too Many Stations.
Don’t fall into the mindless habit of simply adding more devices. “You saw more rodent activity this year so you added supplemental stations and devices,” explained Sheperdigian. “It seems reasonable, but that’s the old way of thinking. Did you evaluate why there was a spike in activity?”
Review the Clues
Sometimes it’s difficult to identify rodent activity versus other pests eating the bait or taking up residence in a device.
The word rodent comes from Latin word “to gnaw.” Rodents have four, long, sharp incisors, two on the top and two on the bottom. The fail-safe way to identify rodent activity is by their gnaw marks. There are always two teeth marks on the top and two on the bottom. These characteristic markings are the most effective way to identify that rodents are eating the bait and not something else.
“There are non-target critters that will also eat bait. Snails and slugs may be some of the biggest bait consumption pests out there,” explained Sheperdigian. “It’s important to avoid placing bait that may be eaten by non-target pests.” The following are bait-loving rodent imposters:
- Ants
- Crickets
- Earwigs
- Snails and slugs
- Voles
- Deer and field mice
- Birds
If you’ve serviced stations and traps, you know there are things that may hang out without nibbling bait, such as scorpions, toads, snakes, lizards and shrews. To bolster your detective skills, here are a few ways to identify who’s been eating the bait.
• Droppings. Just because there are droppings doesn’t mean it’s from mice. Toad droppings look like rodent droppings, but are crumbly. If you try to mash them, they shatter into lots of pieces. Lizard droppings are black with white caps. American cockroach droppings, which vary in color and consistency based on diet, may be confused for mouse droppings. Cockroach droppings have blunt ends and a characteristic six-sided appearance, and their activity drops significantly in fall. Larger round droppings may indicate squirrel activity.
• Eating habits. Mice leave piles of seed hulls and shells. Ants leave consistently sized powder or “crumbs” that look like sandpaper dust. Snails and slugs will eat block bait, and may even eat soft bait. Unfortunately, ants do enjoy soft bait. Stations designed to hold bait for both rodents and invertebrates may be a good choice.
• Trails. Snails and slugs leave a slime trail that looks like silvery threads. If there’s a slug present, you may even see the color of the bait, which is harmless to them, through their translucent body. Lift the bait station or patio block on which it’s mounted to see if you have slugs.
If you continue to add more devices without taking any away, you’re going to reach a point where there isn’t enough time to properly service the account. “It may be that you’re servicing stations when you should be doing something else, such as inspecting,” suggested Sheperdigian. Ask yourself, if I add one device here, is there another I can remove?
If there are a lot of devices and month after month there’s no rodent activity or tangible results, and no bait consumption, you may think the program is working great. Take a step back. You may be making the wrong assumption. What if the devices are in the wrong place?
Sharpen Detective Skills.
Sherlock Holmes never accepted a clue at face value. He probed deeper using his astute logical reasoning and deduction to uncover critical insights. Significant clues are sometimes hidden in plain sight.
“Inspection is absolutely critical when it comes to effective rodent control,” said Sheperdigian. “I would go so far as to say that inspection is the real value that you offer. What clients really need out of a rodent control program is you, your eyes and knowledge to sort through all the clues, obvious and hidden. That’s the value you bring. Put more of your discriminating experience into a rodent control program — not more devices.”
Historical Review.
The new approach to rodent control is to analyze historical data. Reviewing the facts can help you determine rodent population fluctuations and areas of activity, what devices to use, how many and where to place them.
“Historical data is important and helpful,” said Sheperdigian. “What’s difficult is when there isn’t any historical data.” Then what? Rather than guessing, ask around. Talk with the person overseeing rodent control at the facility. Identify others who may also be able to provide some insight. Use the information gathered from third-parties as the basis of your program. Although it may not be ideal, it eliminates purely guessing. It’s a start.
“In addition to using historical data, develop a program guided by current activity,” suggests Sheperdigian. “Place a standard array of bait stations outside and multiple catch traps inside. Run the program for a year and see what happens.”
Plan the Work.
To ensure you’re collecting usable data, the plan should be in writing. “Written plans make good clients. It’s always good for the facility and the pest management firm to know exactly what the plan is,” said Sheperdigian. The plan should document where there’s activity, include a diagram of device placement, list bait being used (only one bait per station), as well as where and when devices are added, moved or removed. The more detailed your documentation the better you’re going to be able to adjust the plan to be increasingly effective.
A year’s data is a good start, but unfortunately it’s not enough to determine what’s going to happen every year. As you acquire multiple years of data you’ll begin to see trends that you can use to develop a more customized plan. Look for trends such as activity in the fall or in vulnerable areas. Most importantly, monitor the facility regularly.
Final Thoughts.
A good rodent control program should be reviewed at least quarterly and revised annually. What worked? What stations have had a lot of activity? Which have had little or no activity, and why? Where is there evidence or reports of activity? Has the physical environment changed, such as a building expansion or additional landscaping?
“Mice can show up in the darndest places with no real explanation as to how they got there or how long they’ve been there,” said Sheperdigian. That’s why it’s always good to inspect every area on a regular basis — annually, quarterly or monthly in some places. “Some areas need regular weekly inspection and if there’s rodent activity, even once a week may not be enough.” The more activity there is the shorter period of time there should be between each review.
“When revising the plan, don’t make all of your changes at once. Make small, incremental changes,” suggested Sheperdigian. “If you do everything at once and things get better, that’s great, but you won’t know what did it. There are swings in rodent activity. It would be devastating if mice were running all over the year after you pulled out a number of devices. It’s really difficult to explain to a client.”
You’re the most valuable addition to a rodent control program. Clients are hiring you for your knowledge, experience and analytical skills. Don’t get caught in the trap of doing things the same way they’ve always been done. How can you optimize every client’s rodent control program?
About the author: Dan Austin is a Florida-based author who writes about pest management frequently. Email him at daustin@gie.net.
Explore the August 2015 Issue
Check out more from this issue and find your next story to read.
Latest from Pest Control Technology
- Apex Bait Technologies Receives USDA Grant
- Orkin Canada Releases 2024 ‘Rattiest Cities’ List
- Ecolab Joins NPMA's Key Partners Program
- Tailor Made Pest Control Acquires Swat Team Pest Control
- FMC and Envu Complete Sale of FMC’s Global Specialty Solutions
- UF Researchers Use AI, Lasers for Precision Spraying to Combat Mosquitoes
- Colony Pest Raising Money to Fight Cancer with NOSHEMBER
- NPMA Announces Leader Launch Class of 2025