Problems & Solutions

Q. We have recently started using termite baits. In attending meetings we have heard discussions about not having to inspect annually, or for that matter, inspecting thoroughly, "since we know termites are there and we are installing a bait system." What is your opinion? (N.K., Elkton, Md.)

A. After all the problems PCOs face in court with lawsuits claiming damages from termites how can anyone — regardless of what control system is being used — neglect to inspect the home? I too have heard this discussion and would warn that this attitude may have some grave consequences. Consider the following:

1. Most states that have requirements for WDI inspections treat all inspections for WDIs the same way, regardless of the method of control selected (or sold). This means that a PCO could face possible regulatory actions if records are not complete or do not meet state guidelines.
2. You need to know what is going on at the structure, not just that "termites are there." You need to document your inspection and list damaged areas where termites have been seen. In many cases, the structure being baited is one that would be on the "top ten" list of problem structures. Do not cause another problem by not documenting damage or evidence.
3. Annual inspections are a mainstay of WDO work in this industry. Annual inspections would open new doors for more work at the structure. The attitude that we do not have to go back in the structure is, in my opinion, an unfortunately shortsighted decision on the part of a service company.

Finally, anyway you look at it, control programs for termites can be rather intense and both physically and mentally challenging. Why we continue to try to place baiting programs into the liquid treatment niche is mind-boggling to me. Anyone who uses a baiting program knows that it involves many visits, continued monitoring and maintenance of the system. If you only want to go to the structure once a year (or only when called by the homeowner) then you should use liquids.

Q. I have a contract for a government facility. Recently with the publicity of West Nile virus, I have been requested to "spray for mosquitoes." This entails spraying shrubs and plants around a day-care center. What are my options? The contract does not include spraying for mosquitoes. (B.D., Washington, D.C.)

A. There are a few options here. Since this is an "IPM" contract, spraying is not necessarily the first step. My first inclination is that this is a knee-jerk reaction to recent incidences in the Maryland area. Here are some options:

1. Inspect and identify the mosquitoes they say they have seen.
2. Inspect the area for standing water and make recommendations to the maintenance department. The Culex mosquito is the main culprit here and it breeds in standing water. I believe these situations are limited in the area of this facility. However, mosquitoes can fly in at any time.
3. Inspect possible resting areas for the presence of mosquitoes. If any are found then application of residuals to surfaces can be performed in accordance with labels. There are several pesticide formulations that could be used and since most of them have a barrier treatment label you will have to assess whether a treatment to "shrubs" is on the label.
4. Provide some educational information to the people at the day-care facility on this insect and concerns about its activity.
5. This is an additional service and an addendum to the contract.

There is something else to consider. If you do have to spray, remember that PCOs are only reducing the possibility of mosquitoes finding a resting place. We are not treating for West Nile virus — we are trying to reduce the opportunity of the vector to multiply or be in close proximity, in this case, to children.

The author is president of George Rambo Consulting Services, Herndon, Va. Fax questions to him at 703/709-9637 or send them via e-mail to grambo@pctonline.com.